Measured latency to Foxbit around the world
REST ticker round-trip from eight AWS regions
Foxbit latency from eight AWS regions
| AWS region | Round-trip |
|---|---|
| N. Virginia us-east-1 | ~62 ms |
| N. California us-west-1 | ~129 ms |
| London eu-west-1 | ~185 ms |
| Frankfurt eu-central-1 | ~186 ms |
| Tokyo ap-northeast-1 | ~258 ms |
| Hong Kong ap-east-1 | ~291 ms |
| Singapore ap-southeast-1 | ~388 ms |
Indicative REST round-trips from our multi-region measurements — for comparing regions, not an SLA. WebSocket feeds are faster in absolute terms, but the regional proportions hold.
Best server location for trading on Foxbit
Host your trading server or bot in AWS N. Virginia (us-east-1): it reaches Foxbit in about 62 ms, fast enough that order placement and market data stay effectively real-time.
Avoid running latency-sensitive strategies against Foxbit from Singapore or other distant regions. At ~388 ms (6× the co-located figure) every price you see is stale before you can act on it, and that staleness turns into slippage on every market order.
Compare with other exchanges
Mercado Bitcoin server location
~61 ms
Binance.US server location
~78 ms
Bitso server location
~121 ms
Upbit server location
~10 msFrequently asked questions
Where are Foxbit's servers located?
Foxbit responds fastest from AWS N. Virginia (us-east-1) — about 62 ms round-trip — which places its API infrastructure in or near N. Virginia.
What is the best server location for Foxbit?
AWS N. Virginia (us-east-1). A server there reaches Foxbit in ~62 ms, versus ~388 ms from Singapore — a 6× difference on every API call.
How much does server location change latency to Foxbit?
In our measurements: ~62 ms from N. Virginia versus ~388 ms from Singapore — a 6× spread. Every order and every orderbook update pays this tax in both directions.